One of the most difficult proof strategies in mathematics is proof by contradiction. If P, for example, is a statement or a conjecture, one strategy to prove that P is true is to assume that P is not true and find a contradiction so that the statement not P does not hold. If not P does not hold, it follows that P is true.
One well-known proof that uses proof by contradiction is proof of the irrationality of . If we consider P to be the statement “
is irrational”, then not P is the opposite statement or “
is rational”. To use proof by contradiction, we assume that
is rational, and find a contradiction somewhere. If this happens, then we would have shown that
is indeed irrational.
Before proceeding, recall that a rational number is a fraction with non-zero denominator. We know that all fractions can be expressed in lowest term. A fraction in is said to be in lowest term if
and
have no common divisors except
.
On the other hand, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as fractions. They are decimal numbers that do not end and do not repeat. For example, is an irrational number (the three dots means and so on which means that the number does not end). The most popular irrational number is
.
Now, we prove our conjecture.
Conjecture: The is irrational.
Proof:
Suppose is rational, then it can be expressed in fraction form
. Let us assume that our fraction is in lowest term, i.e., their only common divisor is
. Then,
Squaring both sides, we have
Multiplying both sides by yields
*
Since , we can conclude that
is even because whatever the value of
has to be multiplied by
. If
is even, then
is also even. Since
is even, no matter what the value of
is, we can always find an integer that if we divide
by
, it is equal to that integer. If we let that integer be
, then
which means that
.
Substituting the value of to
in *, we have
which means that
. Dividing both sides by
, we have
. That means that the value
is even, since whatever the value of
you have to multiply it by
. Again, if
is even, then
is even.
This implies that both and
are even, which means that both the numerator and the denominator of our fraction are divisible by
. This contradicts our assumption that
has no common divisor except
. Since we found a contradiction, our assumption is, therefore, false. Hence, the theorem is true.
Notice that I have highlighted the word suppose and assume in the proof. This is one unique feature of proof by contradiction. You can always assume, most of the time, the opposite of the conjecture as long as the following statements are logically valid.







Stumble It!






[...] Using the Pythagorean Theorem, we now know that the length of the diagonal of a square with side length 1 unit is equal to . We have already discussed and proved that is irrational. [...]
if this involves a √2, then how about proofing the equation (√7+1)?
Use the fact the a rational number added to an irrational number is irrational. Prove that
is irrational. It follows that
is irrational.
[...] Rational and Irrational Numbers post, we have discussed that is irrational. Aside from its radical form, using a calculator or a computer, we can approximate its value; [...]
[...] Proof that log 2 is an irrational number Posted on January 6, 2012 by Guillermo Bautista| Leave a comment var addthis_product = 'wpp-262'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true,"data_track_addressbar":false};if (typeof(addthis_share) == "undefined"){ addthis_share = [];}Before doing the proof, let us recall two things: (1) rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as where and are integers, and not equal to ; and (2) for any positive real number , its logarithm to base is defined to be a number such that . In proving the statement, we use proof by contradiction. [...]
[...] a local book about mathematical problem solving and I came across with a cute proof demonstrating proof by contradiction. According to the authors, the work was based on the lectures given by Oleg Goldberg, an [...]
[...] Proof by contradiction, as we have discussed, is a proof strategy where you assume the opposite of a statement, and then find a contradiction somewhere in your proof. Finding a contradiction means that your assumption is false and therefore the statement is true. Below are several more examples of this proof strategy. [...]