Proof Without Words: If x >0, x + 1/x >=2

A picture is worth a thousand words, even in mathematics. Most of the time, complicated algebraic statements can be shown using geometric representations. One example is the sum of

\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{16} + \cdots

which when added equals 1.

In this post, we show another geometric proof without words. Proof without words is not a proof per se but rather a representation that will help readers understand the proof.  » Read more

Proof without Words: Odds and Squares

In the Mathematical Palette, my mathematics appreciation blog, I wrote about mathematics being a science of patterns. The images below only affirm the beauty of these patterns. they also show the intuitive proof of the statement, or what some people call proof without words.

Do you think the number pattern will continue as the number of circles increase? What conjectures can you make from the pattern?

Exercise: Prove your conjecture.

Mathematical Proofs Without Words: What are they?

In  Proof of the Sum of Square Numbers, I have mentioned about proof without words. Some of you are probably wondering what they are, so I will discuss in detail.

Proof without words are diagrams or pictures that help readers see why a particular statement is true even without accompanying explanations.  One example is a classic proof of the Pythagorean theorem shown in the first figure.

In the example, we have two congruent squares. There are four congruent right triangles occupying portions of both squares. It is clear that the total area occupied by the triangles in the first diagram is equal to the total area occupied by the four triangles in the second diagram. If the occupied areas on both squares are equal, it follows that the unoccupied areas are also equal (Why?). Therefore, c^2 = a^2 + b^2. Now, that proves the Pythagorean theorem.

Proofs without words cannot always be considered as “proof” in the formal sense. For instance, the second figure cannot be considered as a proof since only four cases are shown. The generalization of the figure shows that the sum of the first n positive odd integers (group the numbers by colors) is a square of its nth term or

1 + 3 + 5 +\cdots + (2n - 1) = n^2.

The formal proof of the equation can be demonstrated using mathematical induction.


I am currently reading a collection of Proofs without Words by Roger Nelsen. You may want to check it out.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
1 2